|
Post by caveman on Nov 26, 2010 21:47:47 GMT
This thread seems to have gone even further astray than normal.I've simply got to comment the open can of worms is so here we go. 1) The date of Sahbstock 3 was decided by caths suggestion it was Chris's birthday on the 6/11/10,but I have to conceed that at no point did Cath imply that either she or Chris would attend ,an assumation was made by several of us that both Cath and Chris would attend. 2)Contary to popular belief it was Sahbstock 3 and not Sargestock 3 what the hell did he do to get so hated by the lot of you?Apart from booking the the venue which he'd done on the previous 2 occasions,the bands contacted him and volunteered their services he got the tickets printed. 3)As for not being kept informed everyone knew the date,time and lineup for the event and how to get tickets what more did you need to know? 4)Everyone who volunteered to help,their help was appreciated.Hef designed and was closely involved in the printing of the t shirts.I helped in the raising of prizes for the raffle(although not as sucessful as I'd hoped).Hoggy obtained another fantastic raffle prize and without his help the night would not have been such a sucess.And as ever Penny did all she could. Rather than saying it was Sargestock you ought to be saying thank you to Sarge for another great event. 1. no offence intended here Kevin, but the 6th of Nov was not suggested by catherine, as for her and chris's non-attendance, chris had stated a few years ago that when it was his 60th, he wanted to have it at a perticular hotel close to his heart, and it was arranged so, before sahbstock 1 !!!! 2.Nobody hates Graham, but he divorced himself from the forum, ignored everybody(or almost everybody), he did not invite anyone to get involved in SS3, and as such, it became known as Sargestock, coz it was a one man operation, and all of those involved with the first one and the second one were left out in the cold, some who tried to contact graham were ignored, then after zero posts on the forum for weeks, he appears to tell us he's got great t-shirts for sale, nice to be treated as equals!! 3. as for what more do we need to know, Sahbstock belonged to this forum, the first one was absolutely great and was arranged in the main by TK and big hoggy and sarge and the name sahbstock came from myself, Matt Black did a blinding acoustic set, chad and k9 kev showed us that rap ain't crap when its from the heart, the sahb fan band with chad on vocals and the sarge on drums were a gas, and the great Tigers on Vaseline closed the show, with an impromptu performance from some of SAHB as well, it was great!!! and WE ALL felt involved and proud of what was done and acheived, SS3, we were treated on a need to know basis, an occasional post appeared with a kinda "heres whats happening, take it or leave it" vibe, and for many forum folk it was a kick in the teeth, Sahbstock originated here and here it should stay, no one person on this forum should elevate themselves above the rest. We were basically told when to turn up and be appreciative, after that we could all crawl back under the rock we came out of!! 4.As for volunteering their help, the man running the show was harder to get hold of than Lord Lucan, the bulk of folks on the forum thought graham was the scarlet bloody pimpernel, i tried to contact him through facebook, i'd have been better trying to find shergar the bloody missing racehorse!! is it any great surprise that there were less than a dozen forum members at SS3? SS1 was a great success coz it was all open and done through the forum, SS2 was a great success as well, but some forum stalwarts felt aggreived and didn't attend, and i'll open a big fuckin can of worms right here and now, we are all still in the dark about the Sahbstock 2 auction of SAHB related artefacts and collectibles, who got what and how much was paid for it?? If it was all above board, there should be nothing to hide it was supposed to be a "public" auction, yet one year down the line its as big a mystery as Lord Lucan's postcode, will you put us all out of our misery Kevin? As for other things i personally don't like, Catherine Glen has been castigated/haranged/and basically treated as some "villian of the piece" on this forum by certain folks and their friends, well we can't all be liked all the time and Catherine is no different to anyone else in that respect, but the attitude and barbed remarks and downright insults she has recieved on this forum by certain parties has been outrageous and those who stooped to that kind of low behaviour think fuckin shame on yourselves (no names mentioned here....if the shoe fits............decide for youselves whoever you may be......if you're adult enough) So thats my 10 bobs worth, if i'm wrong, point it out and i will be the first to apologise, if you just don't like it coz there may be a few home truths here, well no apology from me, coz i believe this forum will thrive on honesty and openess and i hope it will go on to greater things.
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 26, 2010 21:57:34 GMT
Lest it make a shred of difference, 6th November is Chris' birthday - next year will be his 60th Hey Cavie I seriously give up with catherines rotty about there aint much chance of any serious debate
|
|
|
Post by caveman on Nov 26, 2010 22:09:50 GMT
you'll need to explain that one, i take it rotty means rottweiler?
read her post again kevin, then read it again, she is dropping a massive hint here, but a helluva lot of egos chose to interpret it their own way, i am not Catherines rotty as you say, she is my friend and has been for a few years now, i couldn't give a shit that chris glen is her brother, i just like catherine for the person that she is and for being a good friend to me and also one of the most honest and forhright people i have ever met, some should try to emulate that quality, then we might get an answer to the question asked in my previous post?
And heres the irony kevin, you were being a wee bit self righteous about what you felt was an attack on your friend graham and you're quite right , he's a good buddy of yours and you felt he had been treated badly, yet why is it Catherine Glen does not get accorded the same privelidge?, i sprang to her defence coz she is my friend, my wife and daughter hold her in high esteem as well, try to make it fair across the board, one rule for all.
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 26, 2010 22:24:26 GMT
Cath is a superb person and we worked well together to co'ordinate the auction at SS2 which actually realized £30 more than it cost me to produce,her support would have meant much to SS3,as would yours but you decided not to help in the raffle at which you did at a sterling job last year,and even though present declined the offer to compere at this years event.
|
|
|
Post by caveman on Nov 26, 2010 22:30:19 GMT
as i have already explained at the time of SS3 i was still "off on the sick" , for me to be seen hale and hearty onstage could be treated as a basis to terminate my employment, i chose not to do that on that basis, someting that was known well in advance, and at the risk of repeating myself kevin, you still ain't answred what was asked?
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 26, 2010 22:34:17 GMT
Which was ?
|
|
|
Post by caveman on Nov 26, 2010 22:39:34 GMT
who bought what and for how much?
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 26, 2010 22:56:24 GMT
Sarge bought the Ted frame for £55 sarge bought the Alex toy soldiers for £50 I bought the alex with troopers fer £50 Brian bought the Zal frame fer £75 but would have paid any price which is why I told TK to back off The Julian frame was given to his wife at Caths suggestion The Maxx frame remains unsold but your offer of £20 was declined but should anyone want to make a serious offer of over £50 the money will be donated to last years charity/
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 26, 2010 23:02:27 GMT
Oh I forgot andy from the tribute had the Hugh frame.
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 26, 2010 23:08:05 GMT
Oh and didnt you volunteer to compere at the scotia bar down shep.
|
|
|
Post by caveman on Nov 26, 2010 23:10:15 GMT
Sarge bought the Ted frame for £55 sarge bought the Alex toy soldiers for £50 I bought the alex with troopers fer £50 Brian bought the Zal frame fer £75 but would have paid any price which is why I told TK to back off The Julian frame was given to his wife at Caths suggestion The Maxx frame remains unsold but your offer of £20 was declined but should anyone want to make a serious offer of over £50 the money will be donated to last years charity/ Thank you for that info, now we know, and i sincerely apologise for any offence implied by myself or inferred by yourself, it wasn't a secret, but it would've been great to be out in the open for all to see, and no-one could've harboured any doubts about anything and SS3's arrangements would've benefitted from the same openess and honesty. As i've said, I apologise for any offence caused by me here, i will try not to do it again, but i will be scrupulously honest unlees to do so would harm another, and i would love for ALL of us to move forward from the recent storms in teacups and to conduct ourselves with dignity and openess in all things.
|
|
|
Post by caveman on Nov 26, 2010 23:22:41 GMT
Oh and didnt you volunteer to compere at the scotia bar down shep. you are correct and remarkebly well informed, i didn't envisage at that point being off my work for 16 weeks, it is also fair to say that graham seemed less than enthusiastic to say the least about that idea, and i assumed he was just being polite so as not to cause offence, but his apparent lack of enthusiasm led me to believe he had other plans, his expression was akin to me asking if i could take a piss on his sunday roast before he ate it?? i tried to contact him through facebook as he no longer seemed to frequent the forum, my overtures on facebook were ignored and he had been on many times yet disregarded my communication, i don't mind, but i was left with the impression that my services were not required, which was fine as well, its not as if i could check the forum for info, could i? so i hope that clarifies things, i only started back to work this week, i attended SS3 to support the event and meet up with old friends, sadly not as many as we would like, but hey thats life.
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 26, 2010 23:36:47 GMT
Ok Cavie end of !!Sahbstock 4 is the next goal we can all work together to make it an event worthy of the prefix SAHB It would be great to include everyone Sarge,Hef,TK,You,Me,Cath,Penny,Platter,Hoggy the list is endless in the words of Isambard Kingdom Brunel lets build bridges.
|
|
|
Post by Catherine on Nov 27, 2010 7:36:47 GMT
Here's Ms Goudie!!!! ;D
Too many cooks WILL spoil the broth.
Those based in and around Glasgow are best placed to be closely involved in the organization of the NEXT ChariTEA Party.
There has been a feeling, over the last couple of years, that a return to the roots of the event would be a good thing.
Preferences have been voiced for a smaller venue, so that it's not so much a gig, with relentless music and no opportunity to socialise. More of a cabaret approach, with food and drink and a series of entertaining turns somewhere in the middle. If a profit is achieved, obviously, it goes to charity - that which begins at home - and maybe we're early enough this time to consider donating the proceeds to The Alex Harvey Memorial Fund.
A new name, for a new beginning, should maybe be considered.
The members of The Sensational Alex Harvey Band should be invited.
The intimate, family atmosphere of the first such event can, hopefully, be recreated to a large degree - but it will always be special, as the first, original and best.
Perhaps those who would seriously like to be actively involved should put themselves forward and a commitee be formed - that looks like a good starting point to me.
I'll just check - oh, bugger!! I have previous engagements all through NEXT November!! Just kidding!! ;D
|
|
|
Post by Catherine on Nov 27, 2010 8:18:35 GMT
This thread seems to have gone even further astray than normal.I've simply got to comment the open can of worms is so here we go. 1) The date of Sahbstock 3 was decided by caths suggestion it was Chris's birthday on the 6/11/10,but I have to conceed that at no point did Cath imply that either she or Chris would attend ,an assumation was made by several of us that both Cath and Chris would attend.
WRONG!!!!!! As if he would even CONSIDER a suggestion by anyone else, far less me!! Read back......... two dates were proposed by the organizer - that was no erronious assumption; that was arrogance and incomprehension. If anyone had deigned to contact me or Chris to ask if we would be attending, the answer was there for the telling. Instead of which, somebody asked somebody else, who didn't know - come on BR this is bullshine and you know it. Somewhere along the line - and not too far back either, the organizer of the event "took agin" me, as you did, when I disagreed with you that he and his tribute band were the only things keeping this forum going.
2)Contrary to popular belief it was Sahbstock 3 and not Sargestock 3 what the hell did he do to get so hated by the lot of you?Apart from booking the the venue which he'd done on the previous 2 occasions,the bands contacted him and volunteered their services he got the tickets printed.
Sorry, ole buddy, wrong again!! It was sargestock as was the one the previous year. I don't hate the man, I'd have to care one way or another to feel such a strong emotion as hate, I remain indifferent to him and his most unfortunate ways.
3)As for not being kept informed everyone knew the date,time and lineup for the event and how to get tickets what more did you need to know?
The more usual endless stream of information and banter that used to precede such an event, be it Tigers on Vaseline or the tribute band, dried up, as the organizer elected to stay off this forum for "various reasons" - he was quick enough back on to advertise the tee shirts though
4)Everyone who volunteered to help,their help was appreciated.Hef designed and was closely involved in the printing of the t shirts.I helped in the raising of prizes for the raffle(although not as sucessful as I'd hoped).Hoggy obtained another fantastic raffle prize and without his help the night would not have been such a sucess.And as ever Penny did all she could. Rather than saying it was Sargestock you ought to be saying thank you to Sarge for another great event.I have already posted what a grand total and well done to all concerned - but when I pondered how odd that we had no news of the total - a full week and a day after the event - previously the total raised, along with a huge vote of thanks and praise has been on here all but the second he got home - I was harangued - again - for having "issues"; with that, he deleted his account and was "outta here" (again)
This time last year, Hef was banned from the event - 12 months down the line.....it couldn't have been done without her, that is not to belittle her efforts.
Why is it called sargestock? Because that's what it was and you know it. SAHBstock was hijacked good and proper. Once more, ole buddy, come along, get your head of his arse and remember how it used to be.
Now, can we let Graham Platt lie? He has deleted his account, therefore, it would seem that he wants nothing to do with this forum - until he gets together yet another tribute band and feels he must bombard all twenty-five of us with the results of his achievements.
My apologies to the forum members, I responded to BR's post, without reading the others which precede it.
You must be bored numb with all this hogwash - I know I am but I think I've now covered all bases - at least twice.
Apologies, good home folks.
|
|
|
Post by Catherine on Nov 27, 2010 8:28:21 GMT
Cath is a superb person and we worked well together to co'ordinate the auction at SS2 which actually realized £30 more than it cost me to produce,her support would have meant much to SS3,as would yours but you decided not to help in the raffle at which you did at a sterling job last year,and even though present declined the offer to compere at this years event. I'm sure that Caveman's post regarding the raffle mooted the iminent arrival of his second grandchild as one of the reasons he felt he could not give enough time to the cause. He also felt that maybe someone else would like to have a go - you know, sharing, like normal people do.
|
|
missmayhem
Junior Member
BIG JACK HARVEY DAVIS
Posts: 82
|
Post by missmayhem on Nov 27, 2010 20:23:06 GMT
Ok, i dont even know im allowed to post here, as was not involved or anything but i do feel everyone is entitled to have an opinion so heres mine for what its worth. I know i also may be seen as being biased as i am Chads wife and TK's daughter, but i do feel that certain things have to be said, and please believe me i will restrain myself for the sake of mentioned relations. I am absolutely raging to see what the Zal frame went for. I dont know if this is known or not, and sorry if im letting the cat out the bag, but my dad offered £70. To see it going for just £5 more than what was offered is a bit of a slap in the face, which i certainly feel so god knows how my dad feels. For him to be told to 'back off' cos Brian ( sorry whos brian, no offence intended i just dont know who you are) would pay any price.... my dad would have paid obscene crazy amounts for that, but to see it going for a fiver more.... this makes it seem less like raising money for charity (cos surely the organisers would want to see the MOST MONEY being made) and more like sly backhanders for pals. I do feel, however, that you did get a better frame dad, and presented by the man himself, money cannot buy that! So a massive thank you to whoever organised that as i am not sure who did! sorry for bringing you into something you didnt want to be brought into dad, but im hormonal ;D How very dare people have a go at people ( i know im being vague, but you dont have to be sherlock to figure it out) for non attendance. Everyone has prior commitments like family members being born, illness and a very sensational brothers landmark birthday. Seriously come on. There is alot ive missed out, but i blame the baby brain and x factor!! If anyone is offended by any comments then thats your problem, so just deal with the fact that a wee lassie who is on the outside looking in is telling it how she feels. Also whoever decided to sell the Zal frame at that price i hope you feel hella guilty because you should. Charity is charity at the end of the day and for you to put a stop to an AUCTION is ridiculous. This is all. Love love xxx
|
|
|
Post by Catherine on Nov 27, 2010 21:05:54 GMT
Ok, i dont even know im allowed to post here, as was not involved or anything but i do feel everyone is entitled to have an opinion so heres mine for what its worth. I know i also may be seen as being biased as i am Chads wife and TK's daughter, but i do feel that certain things have to be said, and please believe me i will restrain myself for the sake of mentioned relations. I am absolutely raging to see what the Zal frame went for. I dont know if this is known or not, and sorry if im letting the cat out the bag, but my dad offered £70. To see it going for just £5 more than what was offered is a bit of a slap in the face, which i certainly feel so god knows how my dad feels. For him to be told to 'back off' cos Brian ( sorry whos brian, no offence intended i just dont know who you are) would pay any price.... my dad would have paid obscene crazy amounts for that, but to see it going for a fiver more.... this makes it seem less like raising money for charity (cos surely the organisers would want to see the MOST MONEY being made) and more like sly backhanders for pals. I do feel, however, that you did get a better frame dad, and presented by the man himself, money cannot buy that! So a massive thank you to whoever organised that as i am not sure who did! sorry for bringing you into something you didnt want to be brought into dad, but im hormonal ;D How very dare people have a go at people ( i know im being vague, but you dont have to be sherlock to figure it out) for non attendance. Everyone has prior commitments like family members being born, illness and a very sensational brothers landmark birthday. Seriously come on. There is alot ive missed out, but i blame the baby brain and x factor!! If anyone is offended by any comments then thats your problem, so just deal with the fact that a wee lassie who is on the outside looking in is telling it how she feels. Also whoever decided to sell the Zal frame at that price i hope you feel hella guilty because you should. Charity is charity at the end of the day and for you to put a stop to an AUCTION is ridiculous. This is all. Love love xxx You have an active account on here, Angie, of course you're allowed to post and having been so involved in SAHBstock, the original, you're pretty well bound to have an opinion.
Good point and well presented on the poor sum achieved on the Zal frame. It was always going to be the most sought after of the frames, which is why we had enough bits and bobs to do two, or more, depending on how the bidding went. No-one begrudges Brian the frame but now that we have the truth on it, we can see that it was badly handled.
Regarding non attendance remarks, vague or otherwise, did anyone invite Hugh or Ted or Zal - or Chris for that matter? We know Maxxxx was all set to go - he's done well not be burned at the stake for not showing up. It's not my non attendance that seems to be the trouble.
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 27, 2010 21:23:08 GMT
Ok, i dont even know im allowed to post here, as was not involved or anything but i do feel everyone is entitled to have an opinion so heres mine for what its worth. I know i also may be seen as being biased as i am Chads wife and TK's daughter, but i do feel that certain things have to be said, and please believe me i will restrain myself for the sake of mentioned relations. I am absolutely raging to see what the Zal frame went for. I dont know if this is known or not, and sorry if im letting the cat out the bag, but my dad offered £70. To see it going for just £5 more than what was offered is a bit of a slap in the face, which i certainly feel so god knows how my dad feels. For him to be told to 'back off' cos Brian ( sorry whos brian, no offence intended i just dont know who you are) would pay any price.... my dad would have paid obscene crazy amounts for that, but to see it going for a fiver more.... this makes it seem less like raising money for charity (cos surely the organisers would want to see the MOST MONEY being made) and more like sly backhanders for pals. I do feel, however, that you did get a better frame dad, and presented by the man himself, money cannot buy that! So a massive thank you to whoever organised that as i am not sure who did! sorry for bringing you into something you didnt want to be brought into dad, but im hormonal ;D How very dare people have a go at people ( i know im being vague, but you dont have to be sherlock to figure it out) for non attendance. Everyone has prior commitments like family members being born, illness and a very sensational brothers landmark birthday. Seriously come on. There is alot ive missed out, but i blame the baby brain and x factor!! If anyone is offended by any comments then thats your problem, so just deal with the fact that a wee lassie who is on the outside looking in is telling it how she feels. Also whoever decided to sell the Zal frame at that price i hope you feel hella guilty because you should. Charity is charity at the end of the day and for you to put a stop to an AUCTION is ridiculous. This is all. Love love xxx Just ask Jim it went for £75 to Zahb I told Jim Zahb was going to pay whatever for the frame couldn't see the point of just letting the price go up and up even for charity.As consalation I made the sahb frame which was given to Jim by Zal at the meal prior to sahbstock 2.I have more respect for Jim than anyone else here.The auction raised £330 for the charity and cost me £240 to produce so at the risk of causing any offence tough.
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 27, 2010 21:24:50 GMT
Here's Ms Goudie!!!! ;D
Too many cooks WILL spoil the broth.
Those based in and around Glasgow are best placed to be closely involved in the organization of the NEXT ChariTEA Party.
There has been a feeling, over the last couple of years, that a return to the roots of the event would be a good thing.
Preferences have been voiced for a smaller venue, so that it's not so much a gig, with relentless music and no opportunity to socialise. More of a cabaret approach, with food and drink and a series of entertaining turns somewhere in the middle. If a profit is achieved, obviously, it goes to charity - that which begins at home - and maybe we're early enough this time to consider donating the proceeds to The Alex Harvey Memorial Fund.
A new name, for a new beginning, should maybe be considered.
The members of The Sensational Alex Harvey Band should be invited.
The intimate, family atmosphere of the first such event can, hopefully, be recreated to a large degree - but it will always be special, as the first, original and best.
Perhaps those who would seriously like to be actively involved should put themselves forward and a commitee be formed - that looks like a good starting point to me.
I'll just check - oh, bugger!! I have previous engagements all through NEXT November!! Just kidding!! ;D
Like this. A considered and reasonable response ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 27, 2010 21:25:50 GMT
This thread seems to have gone even further astray than normal.I've simply got to comment the open can of worms is so here we go. 1) The date of Sahbstock 3 was decided by caths suggestion it was Chris's birthday on the 6/11/10,but I have to conceed that at no point did Cath imply that either she or Chris would attend ,an assumation was made by several of us that both Cath and Chris would attend.
WRONG!!!!!! As if he would even CONSIDER a suggestion by anyone else, far less me!! Read back......... two dates were proposed by the organizer - that was no erronious assumption; that was arrogance and incomprehension. If anyone had deigned to contact me or Chris to ask if we would be attending, the answer was there for the telling. Instead of which, somebody asked somebody else, who didn't know - come on BR this is bullshine and you know it. Somewhere along the line - and not too far back either, the organizer of the event "took agin" me, as you did, when I disagreed with you that he and his tribute band were the only things keeping this forum going.
2)Contrary to popular belief it was Sahbstock 3 and not Sargestock 3 what the hell did he do to get so hated by the lot of you?Apart from booking the the venue which he'd done on the previous 2 occasions,the bands contacted him and volunteered their services he got the tickets printed.
Sorry, ole buddy, wrong again!! It was sargestock as was the one the previous year. I don't hate the man, I'd have to care one way or another to feel such a strong emotion as hate, I remain indifferent to him and his most unfortunate ways.
3)As for not being kept informed everyone knew the date,time and lineup for the event and how to get tickets what more did you need to know?
The more usual endless stream of information and banter that used to precede such an event, be it Tigers on Vaseline or the tribute band, dried up, as the organizer elected to stay off this forum for "various reasons" - he was quick enough back on to advertise the tee shirts though
4)Everyone who volunteered to help,their help was appreciated.Hef designed and was closely involved in the printing of the t shirts.I helped in the raising of prizes for the raffle(although not as sucessful as I'd hoped).Hoggy obtained another fantastic raffle prize and without his help the night would not have been such a sucess.And as ever Penny did all she could. Rather than saying it was Sargestock you ought to be saying thank you to Sarge for another great event.I have already posted what a grand total and well done to all concerned - but when I pondered how odd that we had no news of the total - a full week and a day after the event - previously the total raised, along with a huge vote of thanks and praise has been on here all but the second he got home - I was harangued - again - for having "issues"; with that, he deleted his account and was "outta here" (again)
This time last year, Hef was banned from the event - 12 months down the line.....it couldn't have been done without her, that is not to belittle her efforts.
Why is it called sargestock? Because that's what it was and you know it. SAHBstock was hijacked good and proper. Once more, ole buddy, come along, get your head of his arse and remember how it used to be.
Now, can we let Graham Platt lie? He has deleted his account, therefore, it would seem that he wants nothing to do with this forum - until he gets together yet another tribute band and feels he must bombard all twenty-five of us with the results of his achievements.
My apologies to the forum members, I responded to BR's post, without reading the others which precede it.
You must be bored numb with all this hogwash - I know I am but I think I've now covered all bases - at least twice.
Apologies, good home folks.
Not so keen on this Have a Calmer ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Catherine on Nov 27, 2010 21:29:18 GMT
Here's Ms Goudie!!!! ;D
Too many cooks WILL spoil the broth.
Those based in and around Glasgow are best placed to be closely involved in the organization of the NEXT ChariTEA Party.
There has been a feeling, over the last couple of years, that a return to the roots of the event would be a good thing.
Preferences have been voiced for a smaller venue, so that it's not so much a gig, with relentless music and no opportunity to socialise. More of a cabaret approach, with food and drink and a series of entertaining turns somewhere in the middle. If a profit is achieved, obviously, it goes to charity - that which begins at home - and maybe we're early enough this time to consider donating the proceeds to The Alex Harvey Memorial Fund.
A new name, for a new beginning, should maybe be considered.
The members of The Sensational Alex Harvey Band should be invited.
The intimate, family atmosphere of the first such event can, hopefully, be recreated to a large degree - but it will always be special, as the first, original and best.
Perhaps those who would seriously like to be actively involved should put themselves forward and a commitee be formed - that looks like a good starting point to me.
I'll just check - oh, bugger!! I have previous engagements all through NEXT November!! Just kidding!! ;D
Like this. A considered and reasonable response ;D ;D Thank you. All of my responses are considered and reasonable and factually accurate.
|
|
|
Post by Catherine on Nov 27, 2010 21:34:10 GMT
Not so keen on this Have a Calmer ;D ;D No calmer or even karma needed - I saw what you did there!! If you hadn't reopened the previously resolved can of worms there would have been no need for the considered, reasonable and factually accurate reponse.
You've come back posting about moving forward, pm'ing about getting back on track, a bit more effort needed for that yet BR - on your part - I'm not keen on that
|
|
missmayhem
Junior Member
BIG JACK HARVEY DAVIS
Posts: 82
|
Post by missmayhem on Nov 27, 2010 21:35:45 GMT
Just ask Jim it went for £75 to Zahb I told Jim Zahb was going to pay whatever for the frame couldn't see the point of just letting the price go up and up even for charity.As consalation I made the sahb frame which was given to Jim by Zal at the meal prior to sahbstock 2.I have more respect for Jim than anyone else here.The auction raised £330 for the charity and cost me £240 to produce so at the risk of causing any offence tough.[/quote] Ask Jim what? My dad was also going to pay whatever for the frame, who gives you the right to play god and stop the auction? They are both grown ups ( i assume) so why not let them fight it out amongst themselves with the charity being the outright winner? I understand that you made the second Zal frame up for my dad which i appreciate, and thank you for. My opinion is that if you respected my dad then you would have let the auction carry on. And I respect him, hence why i am saying this (sorry again Dad) The action raised £90 overall but lets face facts, it could have made alot more. But whats done is done, as you done thr framing out of your own pocket, you should have taken some costs back, in which case then the point in pointing that out is pointless. However if you didnt take your expenses back then i guess you have the rights to call the shots to who wins what and so forth.
|
|
|
Post by bluesrider on Nov 27, 2010 21:35:57 GMT
Not so keen on this Have a Calmer ;D ;D No calmer or even karma needed - I saw what you did there!! If you hadn't reopened the previously resolved can of worms there would have been no need for the considered, reasonable and factually accurate reponse.
You've come back posting about moving forward, pm'ing about getting back on track, a bit more effort needed for that yet BR - on your part - I'm not keen on that That post was after my PM
|
|